Blog
The Procrastination Paradox: Why Successful People Do It More (And Better) Than You Think
Our Favourite Blogs:
Stop beating yourself up about putting things off.
I've been watching people struggle with procrastination for the better part of two decades in corporate Australia, and I'm here to tell you something that'll probably ruffle a few feathers: the most successful business leaders I know are actually professional procrastinators. They've just mastered the art of strategic delay, whilst the rest of us fumble around feeling guilty about not tackling our to-do lists fast enough.
Last month, I was consulting with a Sydney-based tech startup CEO who confessed she hadn't touched her quarterly strategy review in three weeks. "I feel terrible about it," she said, practically squirming in her chair. Three days later, she knocked it out in two hours and it was brilliant. Better than anything she could've produced if she'd forced herself to grind through it earlier.
Here's what nobody tells you about procrastination: 73% of high performers deliberately delay starting important projects until they have what psychologists call "optimal cognitive load." Translation? Sometimes your brain isn't ready, and pushing through anyway is like trying to squeeze toothpaste from an empty tube.
The Brisbane Breakthrough
I learnt this lesson the hard way back in 2018. Was running a major change management project for a mining company outside Brisbane – you know the type, everyone's stressed, deadlines everywhere, management breathing down your neck. I had this massive stakeholder engagement plan to write, and every day I'd sit at my desk, open the document, stare at it for twenty minutes, then find myself "researching" competitor strategies on LinkedIn for two hours.
My project manager was furious. "Just get it done!" she'd bark during our daily catch-ups. But something felt off about the whole approach we were taking.
Turns out, my subconscious was doing the heavy lifting whilst I was apparently "wasting time." During those LinkedIn rabbit holes, I was actually absorbing patterns about how other companies handled similar transitions. When I finally sat down to write the plan properly, it practically wrote itself. And it worked. The client extended our contract for another six months based on that document alone.
The thing is, we've been programmed to think procrastination is this moral failing. Rubbish.
The Science Behind Strategic Stalling
Adam Grant talks about this in his research on "pre-crastination" versus procrastination. Turns out there's a sweet spot between starting too early (when your ideas haven't fully formed) and starting too late (when panic kicks in and quality suffers). Most of the business professionals I work with in Melbourne and Perth fall into one of these extremes.
The pre-crastinators are the ones sending emails at 5:47 AM with half-baked proposals because they can't stand having anything sit in their inbox. They're productive, sure, but their work lacks depth. It's like fast food – fills you up but doesn't nourish anyone.
Then you've got your classic procrastinators who wait until the last possible second, fuelled by instant coffee and sheer terror. They often produce decent work (pressure diamonds and all that), but they're slowly killing themselves with stress.
But here's where it gets interesting. The sweet spot procrastinators – let's call them "strategic stallers" – they're playing a completely different game.
The Melbourne Method
I've got a client in Melbourne's legal sector who's mastered this approach. Big law firm, the kind where people regularly work until midnight and think that's normal. This partner – let's call her Sarah – used to be a chronic last-minute Charlie. Then she started what she calls "percolation periods."
When she gets a complex brief, instead of diving straight in, she reads it once, then deliberately puts it aside for 24-48 hours. During this time, she's not actively thinking about it, but her brain is processing in the background. She might be having coffee with colleagues, reviewing other cases, or even binge-watching Netflix. Doesn't matter.
When she comes back to the brief, she consistently produces higher quality work in less time than her colleagues who start immediately. Her win rate has improved by roughly 40% since she adopted this approach. Her stress levels? Down significantly.
The managing partners love her because she delivers results. Her team respects her because she's not constantly stressed and snappy. And she's sleeping better than she has in years.
But here's the kicker – if you watched her during those "percolation periods," you'd think she was slacking off. You'd be wrong.
The Authenticity Problem
Let's talk about something that makes me genuinely angry: the productivity porn industry. You know what I'm talking about – those LinkedIn influencers posting about their 4 AM workout routines and 47-point morning rituals. Makes my skin crawl.
They've convinced everyone that optimal performance looks like constant motion. That if you're not visibly grinding, you're not really working. It's absolute nonsense, and it's making people miserable.
I was guilty of this thinking myself until about five years ago. Used to pride myself on responding to emails within minutes, always being the first to submit proposals, constantly busy. Thought I was being professional. Really, I was just anxious and confusing motion with progress.
The turning point came during a particularly challenging project with a government agency in Canberra. We were tasked with improving efficiency across three departments, and I was running myself ragged trying to analyse everything simultaneously. My recommendations were thorough but generic – the kind of safe, boring advice you'd expect from any consultant.
Then I got food poisoning. Proper knocked-me-flat-for-a-week food poisoning. Couldn't work even if I wanted to. When I finally got back to the project, everything looked different. Patterns I'd missed became obvious. Solutions that seemed impossible suddenly felt straightforward.
The final report was half the length of my original draft but ten times more insightful. The agency implemented 80% of our recommendations – unheard of in government work.
Sometimes the best thing you can do is absolutely nothing.
Why Your Boss Doesn't Understand
Here's the uncomfortable truth: most managers are terrible at recognising valuable procrastination. They see someone not immediately jumping on a task and assume laziness or lack of commitment. It's like judging a chef's skill by how quickly they chop onions instead of how the final dish tastes.
I see this constantly in performance reviews. "Needs to show more urgency" or "Should be more proactive in tackling priorities." Meanwhile, the employee being criticised might be doing their best thinking during these supposed "delays."
The problem is visibility. Pre-crastination looks productive. Panic-based procrastination creates obvious drama that managers can see and address. But strategic stalling? It looks like... nothing special.
This is where you need to become a better communicator about your process. Don't just say "I'm thinking about it." That sounds like code for "I'm avoiding it." Instead, try: "I'm letting this marinate for a day to ensure I'm approaching it from the right angle" or "I want to give my subconscious time to process this before I start."
Sounds more professional, doesn't it? Because it is more professional.
The Art of Productive Procrastination
Not all procrastination is created equal. There's valuable delay and there's just avoidance. Learning to tell the difference is crucial.
Valuable procrastination feels purposeful, even if you can't articulate why. You're not actively working on the task, but you're not completely avoiding it either. It sits comfortably in the back of your mind, like a good wine developing complexity.
Avoidance procrastination feels heavy and guilt-ridden. You know you should be doing something, but every time you think about it, you feel that familiar dread. You find yourself cleaning out your email folders or reorganising your desk – anything to avoid the real work.
The difference is usually emotional. If the thought of your delayed task makes you feel curious or quietly confident, you're probably in strategic mode. If it makes you feel anxious or ashamed, you're likely avoiding something difficult.
The Perth Experiment
Last year, I ran an informal experiment with a Perth-based consulting firm. They were struggling with project quality despite having brilliant people and adequate timelines. Everyone was working hard, hitting deadlines, getting things done. But the work felt... adequate. Safe. Unmemorable.
I suggested they implement what I called "mandatory delays" for their larger projects. After initial planning, teams had to wait at least 48 hours before starting execution. During this time, they could research, discuss, or work on other things, but they couldn't touch the main deliverable.
The pushback was immediate. "We don't have time for delays!" the managing partner protested. "Clients expect quick turnarounds!"
But we tried it anyway on three projects. The results were remarkable. All three delivered significantly better outcomes than similar previous projects. Client satisfaction scores improved. And counterintuitively, despite the forced delays, actual execution time decreased because teams had clearer direction when they finally started.
One team realised during their delay period that they were solving the wrong problem entirely. Instead of optimising the client's existing process, they needed to rebuild it from scratch. That insight saved the client hundreds of thousands of dollars and earned the firm a three-year retainer.
Would they have reached that conclusion if they'd started immediately? Doubtful.
The Goldilocks Zone
Like most things in business, timing is everything. Too little delay and you miss opportunities for insight. Too much delay and you're just avoiding work.
Finding your personal Goldilocks zone takes experimentation. Start by tracking your natural patterns. When do you do your best work? What happens when you force yourself to start immediately versus when you give yourself breathing room?
Most people I work with find their sweet spot somewhere between 24-72 hours for major projects, and 2-8 hours for smaller tasks. But everyone's different. Some brilliant minds need weeks to percolate big ideas. Others hit their stride after just a few hours of subconscious processing.
The key is being honest about what's happening during your delay periods. Are you genuinely processing, or are you just scared to start?
When Procrastination Goes Wrong
Let's be clear: I'm not advocating for missing deadlines or avoiding difficult conversations. That's not strategic procrastination – that's just poor planning.
Real problems arise when you confuse productive delay with simple avoidance. I worked with one Adelaide-based executive who convinced himself he was "strategically stalling" on a redundancy process for months. In reality, he was just terrified of having difficult conversations with affected staff.
The delay didn't improve his approach – it made everything worse. Rumours spread, productivity plummeted, and good people started leaving voluntarily because they sensed something was coming. When he finally acted, it was messier and more painful than if he'd addressed it earlier.
The lesson? If your procrastination stems from fear, skill gaps, or conflict avoidance, dealing with hostility training might be more useful than strategic delay.
The Future of Work
Here's something that'll surprise you: remote work has made strategic procrastination more acceptable, not less. When managers can't see you at your desk, they're forced to judge you on results rather than activity levels.
This is actually brilliant for strategic stallers. Your boss doesn't know if you spent Tuesday morning walking your dog while thinking about that proposal, or if you knocked it out in a focused two-hour session after giving yourself permission to properly think it through.
The organisations adapting to this reality are seeing better outcomes. The ones still clinging to "time in seat equals productivity" are struggling with engagement and retention.
Companies like Atlassian have already figured this out. They give employees permission to work however they work best, whenever they work best. Results speak for themselves.
Making Peace with Your Process
Stop apologising for how your brain works.
If you're someone who needs time to think before acting, own it. Build it into your planning. Communicate it clearly to stakeholders. And for the love of all that's sacred, stop feeling guilty about it.
The business world needs different types of thinkers. We need the quick starters who can respond rapidly to changing circumstances. We need the deep processors who spot problems others miss. We need both, and everything in between.
Your job isn't to conform to someone else's ideal of productivity. Your job is to understand your own patterns and optimise around them.
I spent too many years trying to be someone else's version of efficient. Now I embrace my tendency toward strategic delay, and my work has improved dramatically. My clients get better outcomes. My stress levels have dropped. And I sleep better knowing I'm working with my natural patterns instead of against them.
The next time someone tells you to "just get started," smile politely and remember: sometimes the fastest way forward is to pause long enough to choose the right direction.
Trust your process. It knows more than you think.
Related Articles: